Think about any James Bond movie and then think about
Saving Private Ryan. They're both action movies, yet they're both so different from one another. What gives? Well, in James Bond, it is established early on that the movie will be pseudo-realistic, trading the laws physics for unsurmountable swagger and allowing him
to dodge 4,662 bullets. In
Saving Private Ryan, the viewer understands early on that the plot will be more realistic; the plot might be a mit more depressing, but it will enable the film to portray real life more easily.
When I finally got around the watching the 2008 blockbuster
Taken, I realized that it suffered an identity crisis – was it James Bond or
Saving Private Ryan?